One Ocean

Thursday, 16 January 2025

We Can Work Together to Halt Misinformation

Over the past few years, misinformation about climate change and our ocean has been spreading across news and social media, and many believe it will only get worse. In my work towards ocean climate solutions, I have seen how misinformation can delay climate action and impact policy decisions that affect our ocean. We need to tackle misinformation to push through vital climate solutions, and we can all be a part of this important work.

What is misinformation?

Misinformation is false or incorrect information—essentially, getting the facts wrong—that is spread to the public. Disinformation, a form of misinformation, is false or incorrect information spread deliberately by dishonest actors with the intent to create distrust in the public for their own gain.

Misinformation can take the form of disseminating completely false information or sharing only half the story or by conflating unrelated facts that make a story feel true. Misinformation is similar to gossip. It’s sticky. It’s easy to remember. And when it comes to the ocean, it’s often simpler than the truth.

How does misinformation impact our ocean?

For us at an evidence-based organization, misinformation is very concerning. Ocean systems are dynamic, and it takes an enormous amount of data to understand them. This data can be complex and nuanced, making it difficult to communicate. Organizations like Ocean Conservancy directly study and work with other trusted institutions and agencies to analyze and interpret ocean data to ensure the public and its leaders understand what’s happening in our ocean and what is threatening its health.

Yet, misinformation can affect our ability to protect the ocean and support our coastal communities. Decision-makers, whether at the local or federal level, need accurate information to make science-based decisions and create policies that will protect marine life and communities. If policymakers, and the people they represent and are accountable to, receive unfounded claims, our leaders may spend unnecessary taxpayer dollars or enact policies that are ineffective or even harmful to protecting the ocean.

Take, for example, offshore wind.

Offshore wind is a vital component of reducing our reliance on fossil fuels in order to clean up our air, land and ocean from pollution. It provides jobs and economic growth to coastal communities as well as clean, reliable energy.

Over the past year, anti-offshore wind groups, many of which are funded by fossil fuel interests, have been spreading misinformation about offshore wind. They have made false claims that offshore wind is to blame for recent whale deaths along the East Coast. These claims have been easy to make because offshore wind is a new concept by many who care about the ocean. Yet, there is no scientific evidence linking offshore wind to whale strandings. In fact, increases in whale deaths pre-date offshore wind development in the United States, and researchers have found definitive evidence that vessel strikes and fishing gear entanglement are the top drivers of these tragic strandings.

This misinformation is distracting from true efforts to protect the ocean and marine life from the long-term consequences of climate change. With smart, science-based policy, we can build offshore wind responsibly—providing for communities while protecting wildlife. And we should continue to research and monitor this clean ocean-energy source to increase our understanding and avoid potential future impacts on marine mammals and other ocean wildlife.

What can I do to combat misinformation?

The good news is, we can fight back against misinformation. We invite you, as an ocean lover, to help us combat misinformation by using your savvy investigation skills to spot false claims and address misinformation.

Be aware that misinformation is out there and growing. Sometimes all it takes is a watchful eye to catch false claims, especially in regard to hot-button issues like climate change and the ocean. In fact, once you start looking for misinformation, you may be surprised by how much is out there.
Read beyond the headline. Headlines are intended to pull in the reader, and they often do this by making a far-reaching claim meant to trigger an emotional response. But to really understand, you may need more details, which will only be found in the body of the article. Note that writers often will include the unfounded claims at the beginning of an article and only balance it out with what science actually tells us at the very end.
Look at the source of the information you are reading. When you see a startling negative claim about the ocean, look closely at who is making the claim. Does the person or group have a vested interest in hurting the public’s trust? Does the person or group have a trusted voice on the topic? Is the claim backed by data that was gathered with scientific rigor? If the source is questionable, it may be misinformation.
Verify the claim. If a claim about the ocean is made by a person or group you do not know, confirm it is true with a trusted organization. Check here on the Ocean Conservancy blog for information or sign up for updates, or look to these other trusted organizations that bring evidence-based science to policy such as the Marine Mammal Commission, Monterey Bay Aquarium, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Natural Resources Defense Council and National Wildlife Federation.
Do not share the misinformation, and help others know it’s false as well. The biggest way you can fight back against ocean misinformation is to stop it in its tracks. If you find misinformation, do not share it. If you are confident enough to speak out about it, remember that correcting people is delicate. Try to meet people on common ground, such as our collective desire to protect the ocean, and offer trusted resources where they can learn more—like Ocean Conservancy.

If you want more resources on offshore wind in the United States, visit Ocean Conservancy’s clean ocean-energy hub today.

The post We Can Work Together to Halt Misinformation appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.

from Ocean Conservancy https://ift.tt/3Tg1AYo

Wednesday, 15 January 2025

Plastic Bottles & Lids Among Top 10 Most Commonly Found Items at Cleanups

This blog was written by Hannah De Frond. Hannah works with Ocean Conservancy and the University of Toronto Trash Team to manage the International Trash Trap Network (ITTN), a global network of local groups using trash traps to increase cleanup efforts, engage communities and inform upstream solutions.

The use of single-use plastics has grown significantly over the last few decades. Many of the plastics thrown away daily—such as plastic packaging, takeout cups, container lids, plastic bottles and grocery bags—are used just once before they are discarded.

Incredibly, 80% of global marine litter items are made of plastics, primarily food and beverage items such as plastic bottles, bottle caps and lids. These items are also among the top 10 items most commonly collected by Ocean Conservancy’s International Coastal Cleanup® (ICC) volunteers around the world. So, what is it about plastic bottles, caps and lids that makes them so likely to enter the environment, and what can we do to prevent them from polluting our ocean?

Plastic bottles

Plastic bottles are the third most common type of plastic pollution collected throughout the nearly 40-year history of the ICC. From 1986-2023, ICC volunteers removed a staggering 24.3 million plastic bottles from coastlines around the world.

Ocean Conservancy estimates that 127 billion plastic bottles are used in the United States each year; due to their widespread use, they have become a major contributor to environmental pollution. Whole plastic bottles have even been found in the stomachs of an albatross and a sperm whale! As with all plastics, in the environment plastic bottles break up into microplastics that pose a threat to wildlife and potentially to human health as well. Most plastic bottles are made of a type of plastic called polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Though this material on its own is widely recyclable, many PET bottle designs use colored plastics and labels that can prevent them from being sorted or recycled correctly.

How can we tackle plastic bottle pollution?

Refillable beverage containers help reduce our reliance on single-use plastic bottles when we use them to transport tap water, fountain sodas, teas or other beverages. This alleviates the need for single-use beverage bottles each time a refillable container is used and eliminates the possibility that the plastic bottle might go to landfill or be leaked into the environment as pollution.

Policies such as extended producer responsibility (making producers responsible for the waste generated by the use of their plastic products) and deposit-return systems (also known as “bottle bills”) can encourage the redesign and reuse of plastic bottles, while holding the producers of plastic bottles accountable to help pay for the full lifecycle of their materials.

Plastic bottle caps

Along with plastic bottles come plastic bottle caps. When bottle caps are thrown into recycling bins separately from bottles, they are too small to be properly sorted at recycling facilities and instead often end up getting sent to landfill. Bottle caps that end up in the environment can have a considerable impact on marine life. Ocean Conservancy has identified plastic bottle caps as one of the top five deadliest forms of marine pollutionto large species such as seabirds, sea turtles and marine mammals, largely due to the harms of ingesting them. Plastic bottle caps can also generate microplastics when they degrade in the environment, but also from the twisting action used to remove a cap from its plastic ring. When bottles are repeatedly opened and closed from drinking, it potentially increases human exposure to microplastics.

How can we tackle plastic bottle cap pollution?

As with plastic bottles, switching to reusable and refillable beverage containers will reduce the amount of plastic bottle caps that are used and ultimately thrown away. When single-use plastic bottles and caps are used, to ensure that both the plastic bottles and caps get recycled the caps must be screwed back on before they are disposed of for recycling. Policy measures can encourage this behaviour: For example, in Europe it is now legally required for all caps on plastic bottles to be attached or tethered to the bottles. Drinking from bottles with the caps still attached has required some getting used to for consumers, but this subtle change is significantly improving bottle cap recyclability.

Plastic lids

Plastic lids like the ones that come with a cup of coffee, on a fountain beverage or on top of a yogurt container are some of the most commonly found single-use plastic items found on global beaches and waterways. Because of their size, plastic lids are too small or narrow for recycling sorting machines to manage. This means that instead, plastic lids often end up in landfills or burned in incinerators. In fact, plastic lids are the ninth most common type of plastic pollution collected in the history of Ocean Conservancy’s ICC. From 1986-2023, ICC volunteers have encountered and cleaned up more than 7.3 million plastic lids around the world. The United States alone uses more than 60 billion single-use plastic lids each year. That is enough for every adult in the United States to have a beverage with a plastic lid every day for eight straight months each year.

How can we tackle plastic lid pollution?

As with plastic bottles, the need for many plastic lids can be eliminated through investments in reuse or encouraging behavior changes to skip the lid or dispose of them properly. The most effective solution for lids is to transition to reusable cups and lids. Replacing one disposable coffee cup and lid every day for a year with a reusable mug would result in about 15 pounds of plastic waste prevented per person. Just imagine: If 100 million people did this—just under half of all adults in the United States—it would result in roughly 1.5 billion pounds of plastic debris prevented each year.

To reduce the impacts of plastic bottles, bottle caps, lids and other single-use plastics on our ocean we need to handle them better on land. We need to reduce the sheer volume of plastics produced and used, while holding plastic producers responsible for the harmful waste they have generated and continue to pump into the environment. Taking individual action and supporting local and national policies for the reduction, reuse, recycling and redesign of single-use plastic food and beverage items can help to keep our ocean plastic free.

To learn more about the most common types of plastic pollution entering our ocean and what you can do to help, check out our reports on charting a course to plastic-free beaches.

The post Plastic Bottles & Lids Among Top 10 Most Commonly Found Items at Cleanups appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.

from Ocean Conservancy https://ift.tt/BG98soC https://ift.tt/1uLZNXk

Friday, 20 December 2024

Making Ornaments From Ocean Plastic in Alaska

This year, the U.S. Capitol Christmas Tree traveled for more than three weeks across 4,000 miles from the Tongass National Forest in Southeast Alaska for display on the Capitol’s West Lawn in Washington D.C. The 80-foot Sitka spruce, nicknamed “Spruce Wayne,” was handpicked from the small community of Wrangell, located 120 miles from where I live in Sitka.

You may be asking yourself—why are we highlighting this tree from Alaska?

This year’s tree is especially unique due to the ornaments decorating its branches. More than 10,000 ornaments were handmade in Alaska, and among them are several dozen ornaments created from marine debris collected during Ocean Conservancy beach cleanups in Sitka. Over the past year, Ocean Conservancy helped collect more than 145,000 pounds of trash from beaches and waterways in Alaska and the Arctic as part of our ongoing effort to combat plastic pollution in the Arctic.

On September 26, Ocean Conservancy’s staff in Sitka organized a marine debris ornament-making workshop in partnership with the Sitka Sound Science Center and the U.S. Forest Service Sitka Ranger District. About 20 members of the community—including kids and adults—came together to learn about Ocean Conservancy’s work and transformed discarded fishing nets, ropes, buoys and plastic bottles into ornaments shaped like sea creatures and flowers.

This year’s Capitol Christmas tree and the ornaments adorning it are reminders of the connections we share—from the forests of Southeast Alaska to the steps of the Capitol in Washington, D.C.—and highlight the importance of protecting our ocean and environment from plastic pollution. For those of you in D.C. lucky enough to admire the tree this year, keep an eye out for these unique marine debris ornaments created during our workshop, including some I even made myself! And even if you’re not able to see the U.S. Capitol tree in person, we hope this story inspires you to get creative and make eco-friendly or recycled holiday decorations of your own, like an egg carton candy cane, tin can snowmen or other ideas in this ocean-friendly DIY holiday decor guide or design your own ugly holiday sweater.

Creating ornaments from marine debris collected in Sitka, Alaska for the U.S. Capitol Tree

The post Making Ornaments From Ocean Plastic in Alaska appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.

from Ocean Conservancy https://ift.tt/i5g0PwI https://ift.tt/w2moFuV

Wednesday, 18 December 2024

The Risks of Deep-Sea Mining

Critical minerals are key components of clean-energy technologies, which are essential to replacing fossil fuels and stabilizing the climate. At present, the United States is highly dependent on critical minerals to support a growing electric vehicle market. Yet, the United States is also vulnerable to growing geopolitical realities and supply-chain bottlenecks. China, a major supplier of these minerals to global markets, just announced a ban on some exports to the United States.

This situation raises a red flag for Ocean Conservancy as we strive to protect our ocean forever and for everyone. While some are looking to the ocean as the next frontier for securing these minerals, countries like China are positioned to mop up the international seafloor. Should they do so, this would only further weaken the United States by bolstering China’s dominance over critical mineral supplies.

However, according to two new reports by Planet Tracker, an award-winning nonprofit that focuses on sustainable finance, deep-sea mining would be an economic boondoggle, particularly for developing countries. Simply put, seabed mining would be little more than a gold rush, benefitting the few at the expense of the many.

In its first report, Planet Tracker evaluated the financial impact of deep-sea mining on the economies of 12 developing countries that currently obtain critical minerals from land-based mines. All 12 countries are characterized as dependent or highly dependent on the mining sector for revenue.

A market influx of marine-derived minerals, particularly cobalt, copper and nickel, is expected to directly compete with these land-based sources, depressing export earnings of countries with land-based mining operations. Planet Tracker estimates that these 12 countries, with a combined $560 billion in export revenue, would be vulnerable to potentially destabilizing price shocks as a result.

The International Seabed Authority (ISA) previously confirmed that seven of the countries in Planet Tracker’s analysis are at the greatest risk of economic harm from market saturation if or when companies begin extracting polymetallic nodules from the seabed. ISA is required to compensate developing countries for economic losses related to the impacts of seabed minerals on their export or market prices. However, the annual amount of ISA compensation each country could expect would be only $1.1 million, a paltry sum considering the 12 countries each currently generate between $5-240 billion in critical mineral export revenues.

In Planet Tracker’s second report, ISA member countries or states sponsoring mining companies were found to receive nominal payments, either in taxes or royalties, should deep sea mining proceed. The amounts of payments to members depends on the number of ISA’s financial and legal obligations, which could be substantial and take precedence over payouts to members. For example, ISA could be required to restore seafloor habitats damaged by mining, with the potential to significantly reduce royalties to member states. By one estimate, the cost to restore the seafloor on a per km²basis could be as high as $5.3-5.7 million. According to ISA, a typical 20-year mining operation could impact an area of around 8,500 per km². This means the potential total cost to restore the footprint of a 20-year mining tract could be as high as $48 billion, all but depleting funds for payments.

Developing countries sponsoring mining companies also might not see a dime in corporate income taxes because of the sponsorship agreements that waive company taxes. Small Island Developing States could also receive far fewer royalties than more populous countries if the amount of money to be distributed from the ISA royalty fund is tied to population size.

To add salt to the wound, Small Island Developing States could potentially experience a greater share of the environmental impacts from mining operations if the marine ecosystems on which they depend for food or cultural uses are harmed. According to one study, some Small Island Developing States or developing countries catch as much as 10% of their tuna from areas likely to see some of the earliest and largest deep-sea mining operations. In a separate study, Ocean Conservancy identified the overlap of fisheries with prospective locations for mining critical minerals in U.S. federal waters. The potential impacts of deep-sea mining on ecosystem services like fisheries and seafood are among the reasons Ocean Conservancy is advocating for a moratorium on deep-sea mining.

When you add up all the financial and economic impacts, the conclusion is that deep-sea mining would be tragically unnecessary for the ocean and for local communities, especially those located in Small Island Developing States.

But we can put the energy transition on a different path, one not dependent on minerals scoured from the deep seafloor. Technological innovation is already rapidly moving electric car batteries away from the types of minerals or metals found on the deep seabed. Some minerals, such as cobalt, a critical component in electric vehicle batteries, can instead be extracted directly from seawater, which contains 70 times more cobalt than land. Decommissioned offshore oil platforms in the Gulf of Mexico could serve as structures for harvesting cobalt, an elegant example of how old energy infrastructure can support new sources of climate- and ocean- friendly energy.

An international moratorium on seabed mining is needed to prevent further dominance of the global mineral supply chain by China and other countries. This action would give the U.S. valuable time to achieve critical mineral independence through a domestically centered supply-chain strategy that prioritizes technological efficiency, material substitution and circularity.

Society simply has too much to lose ecologically—and very little to gain economically—by plundering the deep seabed for critical minerals.

If we don’t act now, we risk sleepwalking into deep-sea mining and doing irreversible harm to the ocean. Take action with Ocean Conservancy to halt seabed mining in its tracks.

The post The Risks of Deep-Sea Mining appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.

from Ocean Conservancy https://ift.tt/GScK3LP https://ift.tt/ICZzJEr

Friday, 13 December 2024

Fingerprinting the Source of Nitrogen Pollution in Tampa Bay

This blog was written by Kassidy Troxell, Ph.D., a Research Assistant Professor at Florida international University’s Institute of Environment, and collaborator with Ocean Conservancy on our work to promote healthy Florida aquatic ecosystems. Dr. Troxell is a lead scientist executing the nitrogen fingerprinting discussed in this blog.

November was Manatee Awareness Month, a month dedicated to highlighting the popular aquatic mammal and the broader importance of clean, healthy waterways in Florida. One of the greatest challenges to water quality in areas like Tampa Bay is nutrient pollution. Excess nutrients in coastal waters fuel harmful algae which “bloom” into patches, one example is the well-known Karenia brevis referred to as red tide, causing fish kills and human respiratory problems while also reducing the sunlight needed by underwater seagrasses to flourish. These blooms diminish essential seagrass habitats, impacting marine species like manatees, harming local ecosystems and affecting human health. Identifying the primary sources of nutrient pollution is crucial for developing targeted strategies to control nutrient levels and maintain the health of delicate ecosystems.

In Tampa Bay, my lab at Florida International University has partnered with Ocean Conservancy to do just that: understand and address nitrogen pollution, the nutrient that contributes to water quality impairment, in the Hillsborough Bay and the larger Tampa Bay ecosystem. By using manmade or commonly used chemicals, we can pinpoint the sources of nitrogen—whether from untreated stormwater street runoff, treated home, business or industrial wastewater, or agriculture—allowing for more targeted management efforts. Just as each of us humans have our own unique fingerprints made of various patterns and distinctions, contamination sources have a unique makeup of compounds that allows us to fingerprint and track their movements throughout a watershed.

Key findings from recent study in Tampa Bay

The Hillsborough River, which flows into Hillsborough Bay and is vital to the health of Tampa Bay’s ecosystem, serves as the geographic focus of our study. Our preliminary results reveal that nitrogen levels in these waters rise significantly during the wet season when runoff is at its peak. Chemical tracers, which act like “markers” for pollution sources, suggest that reused non-drinkable treated water (reclaimed water), stormwater and agriculture are contributing sources of nitrogen into the waterway. Within the Hillsborough River watershed, nitrogen levels show distinct patterns (i.e., “fingerprints”) linked to various sources: reclaimed water and agricultural activities are prominent in the upper watershed, while urban stormwater runoff and wastewater inputs are notable near the river’s mouth. Potential contributions from other sources, such as septic systems, are still under investigation.

Now that we have identified the preliminary nitrogen sources and hotspots, the next phase of the project will focus on the sources that are contributing the largest nitrogen loads, the geographic origins of those sources and the amounts of the nitrogen going into the waterways. Future sampling will expand sampling sites in the tributaries that feed into the preliminary hotspot locations along the mainstem (the primary downstream river segment in contrast to its tributaries). This information will help tailor interventions to reduce nitrogen loads at the source and guide management efforts to improve water quality and ecosystem recovery in Tampa Bay.

The future of Florida’s water quality

Our research underscores the need to better manage nutrient levels to protect Florida’s coastal waters. The data generated from our study will give policymakers a more precise geographical understanding of nitrogen hotspots for prioritizing actions to curb nutrient pollution. Indeed, Ben Albritton, the incoming Majority Leader of the Florida state senate, recently said as much when he pointed to the importance of fresh, accurate data needed to drive solutions, whether these are new policies, investments or on-the-ground management practices.

Our activities on land—whether through treated wastewater, stormwater runoff or agricultural practices—have direct impacts on coastal ecosystems. While the Hillsborough River is the focus of this pilot study, we believe the nutrient fingerprinting techniques will be a valuable water quality management tool in other Florida estuaries and bays as well. By pinpointing and quantifying the largest nutrient sources, we can better protect the health of our marine environments and communities alike, which will benefit all Floridians.

Undoubtedly, Florida’s waterways are facing enormous challenges. Ocean Conservancy is dedicated to addressing nitrogen pollution, in part, for marine species like manatees that are so greatly impacted by threated water quality. Take action with Ocean Conservancy to demand greater protections for imperiled manatees and improvements in water quality in Florida and beyond.

The post Fingerprinting the Source of Nitrogen Pollution in Tampa Bay appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.

from Ocean Conservancy https://ift.tt/oqgdsRx https://ift.tt/6laiLuE

Tuesday, 10 December 2024

COP29 Reflections

As we reflect on the outcomes of COP29, the most recent UN Climate Change Conference, we are struck by the stark contrast between the urgency of the climate crisis and the lack of decisive action by world leaders. COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, fell short in many ways—chief among them, its failure to mobilize adequate climate finance and renew the call to transition away from fossil fuels.

The last-minute $300 billion climate finance deal secured at COP29 falls far short of meeting the urgency of the moment, especially when experts and economists recommend mobilizing $1 trillion per year for developing countries by 2030. That seems like a tall order, but, ironically, $1 trillion in finance does exist—it’s roughly the amount being spent annually on subsidies for the fossil fuel industry. The deal forged in Baku is riddled with loopholes, devoid of real commitment to grants-based finance and inadequate for implementing the ambitious national climate plans required to limit warming to 1.5°C. The continued expansion of fossil fuels and the insufficient financial commitments for climate adaptation and mitigation are particularly harmful to the ocean. The impacts of climate change—warming, acidifying and rising seas—are already devastating marine ecosystems and threatening billions of livelihoods.

To avoid the worst impacts of climate change, efforts to decarbonize the energy sector must accelerate through innovative and scalable solutions. Together with the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Ocean Conservancy co-hosted an official side event at COP29 where we launched a guidance tool designed to integrate responsible offshore wind energy into Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs). NDCs, the commitments made by countries under the Paris Agreement, are crucial for driving efforts and increasing climate ambition and climate finance worldwide.

This tool is designed to help decision-makers set specific wind targets for responsible offshore wind projects, develop supportive policies, secure financial resources and integrate this work into their climate action plans. Produced by Ocean Conservancy and the Global Offshore Wind Alliance (GOWA), the NDC Guidance Tool is part of a broader series aimed at advancing the inclusion of ocean-based climate solutions in NDCs and generating financial and policy support for their implementation.

Regrettably, the COP29 Presidency did not prioritize ocean or nature-related topics. Nevertheless, the ocean community remains mobilized. Despite the absence of a decision text advancing the ocean-climate nexus, the Friends of the Ocean and Climate network released a powerful joint statement at the closing plenary. Representing 72 countries and the African Group of Negotiators, the statement reaffirmed their commitment to sustainable ocean-based climate solutions and the urgent need for climate finance to implement them. Ocean Conservancy, as Secretariat for this network, is proud to support these ocean-climate champions. Their leadership is critical as we strive to fully integrate the ocean into discussions on climate finance, NDCs and National Adaptation Plans.

COP29 took place under challenging international circumstances that undermined multilateralism and set a difficult tone for negotiations. Yet, several countries reaffirmed their commitment to collective action—a sentiment echoed in the G20 Leaders’ Declaration released during the conference. Climate disinformation was a significant factor, prompting UN Secretary-General António Guterres to highlight the dangers of “coordinated disinformation campaigns impeding global progress on climate change.” Brazil, the UN and the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) launched the “Global Initiative for Information Integrity on Climate Change” at the G20 Summit, marking a crucial step in combating climate misinformation.

Looking ahead to COP30 in Belém, Brazil, the window of opportunity to prevent irreversible damage to our ocean and coastal communities is rapidly closing. The road to COP30 must be paved with ambition. The upcoming UN Ocean Conference in Nice, France, in 2025 offers a unique opportunity to connect the dots between COP29 and COP30, building momentum for meaningful ocean action. The recent declaration by President Macron of France and President Lula of Brazil to prioritize ocean protection in their climate and biodiversity commitments brings hope that COP30 can be a turning point for ocean-climate solutions.

On a personal note, COP29’s shortcomings weigh heavily on us as both climate advocates and parents. The IPCC’s Sixth Assessment Report is unequivocal: human influence has warmed the planet, and our ocean—the lifeblood of our climate system—is bearing the brunt. COP29’s failure to deliver meaningful progress feels like a betrayal of future generations. Yet, failure is not an option. We must demand more. Parties must submit NDCs aligned with the 1.5°C target and embrace the clean energy transition. Climate finance must be concessional, grants-based, accessible and reliable. The science is clear, and the stakes could not be higher. We left Baku feeling disheartened but not defeated. The fight continues—for the ocean, for our planet and for our children.

The post COP29 Reflections appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.

from Ocean Conservancy https://ift.tt/vTdZGew https://ift.tt/0kaL7xw

Wednesday, 4 December 2024

Celebrating Ocean Victories of 2024

As we enter Ocean Conservancy’s 53^rd year, we bring a powerful legacy of success to tough global challenges. We are the best equipped organization to protect and defend our ocean from its greatest threats. The root of that strength is the community of supporters who stand with Ocean Conservancy as we unite people, science and policy for the good of the ocean and everyone and everything that depends upon it. I send my deepest appreciation to every person who lent us their time, passion and support this year.

The year 2024 was one of incredible accomplishments in protecting our ocean from the crises of plastic pollution, biodiversity loss and climate change. As I do each year, I wanted to take a moment to reflect on our most recent victories and proudest moments of the last year even as we look forward to the coming year.

Achieving international climate action

There is no path to halting climate change without scaling up offshore wind, and Ocean Conservancy has been a key player in advancing this solution at the international level. At the global climate conference in late 2023 in Dubai (the UN Conference of Parties’ 28^th gathering, or COP28), our intensive advocacy secured a change that will have international ramifications for decades to come. Thanks to Ocean Conservancy, the “report card” that nations use to track progress on their climate goals will now include clean ocean energy like offshore wind (OSW) as a key measure of progress. This ensures that nations are accountable for OSW’s responsible, rapid and just development. In 2024, we continued pushing the international community to act by releasing a first-of-its-kind analysis on the affordable financing of OSW in nations least able to afford it. At COP29 in Azerbaijan this November, the so-called “finance COP,” we called for the international community to commit to the funding necessary for developing countries to responsibly deploy offshore wind and other ocean-climate solutions.

Advancing scientific research into plastic pollution

In early 2024, researchers from Ocean Conservancy and the University of Toronto shared the results of startling new research, published in the journal Environmental Pollution, which found microplastics in 88% of protein samples tested. The samples were drawn from 16 different protein types destined for U.S. consumers, including seafood, pork, beef, chicken, tofu and three different plant-based meat alternatives. There were no statistical differences in microplastic concentrations between land- and ocean-sourced proteins, suggesting that humans are likely eating microplastics no matter what protein they choose. To date, there had been little research into whether microplastics enter the filets of the fish—the parts that are actually eaten by people—and little research into terrestrial protein sources like beef and chicken that make up a large part of the American diet. The study was covered in major news outlets like The Washington Post and PBS.

Safeguarding the Arctic

This year, we upheld legislative safeguards that prevent oil drilling in sensitive Arctic environments. Ocean Conservancy and our partners prevented the passage of legislation that included mandatory oil and gas leasing. We also launched a new campaign in partnership with Oceans North aiming to win an international agreement not to ship though, or mine from, Central Arctic Ocean waters. In an early win, Canada has already signaled support for our goals. This builds on our previous success negotiating a similar international agreement not to fish in these waters to protect this ocean that lies at the heart of the Arctic.

Scaling up for trash removal

Our work organizing the International Coastal Cleanup® (ICC), now in its 39^th year, connects more than 485,000 volunteers annually to gather trash from our beaches and shores. Hands-on, individual actions for safe and healthy coastlines add up to a robust and thriving international movement. This year, thanks to a new partnership with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA), Ocean Conservancy will take our effort to the next level and remove Large Marine Debris from U.S. coastal waters and support efforts by communities around the country to supercharge cleanup efforts. In addition to the unfathomable human and animal toll of recent hurricanes, the ensuing flooding marked the largest mass dumping of trash into the ocean in recent memory. Ocean Conservancy is here for the long haul to support coastal communities as they clean up and rebuild.

There are too many stories of success to tell them all in full, but this year we also:

Recycled 81,073 pounds of end-of-life fishing gear through our Global Ghost Gear Initiative®, protecting countless marine animals from entanglement and death.
Changed governance policy to advance ecosystem-based approaches to fisheries management.
Reduced shipping and port pollution in California by requiring vessels to plug into shore power and reduce harmful emissions when in port. We also defeated bills that would weaken clean shipping standards and won a major commitment to develop new rules to accelerate eliminating emissions from large ocean-going vessels.
Protected Florida’s coastlines with a state-wide ban on the intentional release of balloons, a particularly fatal type of pollution for seabirds and other marine animals.
Celebrated the end to the #TeamSeas campaign, which smashed its goals ahead of schedule, cleaning more than 34 million pounds of trash from the ocean while inspiring a new generation of young people to join our movement.
Launched an innovative partnership with three Florida universities to identify the sources of nitrogen pollution, which cause toxic algal blooms, in Florida waters.

I am inspired by the creativity, grit and determination our experts bring to this work. Catastrophic Gulf storms this year impacted Ocean Conservancy staff, as well as tens of millions of others across the country. Yet our incredible team kept defending and protecting our ocean, even while facing personal setbacks. That’s because we all recognize that our impact matters. And our impact is greater, thanks to supporters like you.

As conservationists who care deeply about our blue planet, we have much to celebrate from this year, as well as challenges to overcome. We are ready to turn the page and gear up for the critical years ahead.

Together, we can win a healthy ocean and a thriving planet, forever, and for everyone. I hope that you will stand with us in the year to come—our ocean needs you, now more than ever.

The post Celebrating Ocean Victories of 2024 appeared first on Ocean Conservancy.

from Ocean Conservancy https://ift.tt/mw4UPf5 https://ift.tt/650ozhS